His apparent willingness to equate Calvinism with ‘Reformed Theology’ and use the terms interchangeably is extremely unfortunate. Calvinism is indeed Reformed Theology, but Reformed Theology is not necessarily Calvinism. Zwingli and Bullinger both offer Reformed Theology and that before Calvin even came along.
There’s sufficient confusion amongst the masses concerning the Reformation in its many manifestations and the suggestion, hint, or even misprision that Reformed Theology = Calvinism simply adds to and continues that misrepresentation.
Hopefully he will correct this misrepresentation in due course but he should have done so at the very outset.
More, of course, anon.
UPDATE: Fortunately he does distinguish between ‘Calvinism’ and Reformed, though not till the second chapter. I reiterate, he should have done so from the start. A simple sentence could have sufficed to deter his readers from thinking that Reformed = Calvinism. Further, his failure to do so simply opens the door to misunderstanding. ‘Well at first it seemed like he saw the two things as one and now he’s saying they’re different…’ one can easily imagine readers saying to themselves, and justifiably.
Related articles
- For Calvinism… Or Against Calvinism… (zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com)
You must be logged in to post a comment.