Archive for the ‘pseudo-archaeology’ Category
Antonio Lombatti writes
Alcuni giornalisti hanno scelto questo titolo: Jesus’ House? 1st-Century Structure May Be Where He Grew Up. Dove è addirittura cresciuto! Un titolo che tira. Sicuramente. Ma che non ha nulla da spartire con la ricerca storica. Il giornalista, infatti, parla di un’abitazione del tempo di Gesù a Nazareth, è vero. La datazione della struttura, tuttavia, risale al 2006 ed è opera di Ken Dark dell’Università di Reading. Roba già nota, insomma. Ma con la Pasqua che si avvicina, basta fare un titolo così per avere qualche lettore in più.
I’ll not be watching, since I am taking the year off from the absurd genre of religion/bible tv docu-mockeries. I only mention it because CNN has this little gem of ick in its ‘money’ section… which, whether they know it or not, is exactly the central concern of all these idiotic specials with their idiotic claims and poor scholarship.
Note too the little sentences at the bottom. I’ll go ahead and answer them for you – who cares, and nothing.
TV specials around Easter and Christmas are always the most sensationalistic and ridiculous. This is, no doubt, just the first of many this year.
NB- No, I haven’t seen it. Yes, I am within my rights to criticize it because I’ve seen enough of these things to know what’s going to happen. There will be an outlandish claim followed by a talking head from the fringe of scholarship or of the anti-theistic sort followed by a fundamentalist’s opinion followed by another ridiculous claim… etc. At the end of the day balanced scholarship will be absent. It’s always absent. So, yes, I am within my rights to mock not only the individual special but the entire genre.
Simcha really wants to silence anyone who might lift their voice contra his failed scholarship. His suit against Vanderbilt and Jensen moved forward Tuesday. Well, against Jensen anyway. A judge has determined that Vanderbilt isn’t at all involved.
The producers of a archeological documentary have a contract interference claim against a Vanderbilt University professor but not against the university itself, a federal judge ruled.
Associated Producers Ltd. and Simcha Jacobovici sued Vanderbilt and professor Robin Jensen for interfering with their National Geographic contract to produce an “archeological film concerning the burial cave in Jerusalem,” the ruling says.
Jensen agreed to appear in the documentary as an expert on ancient Christian art, but she convinced Nat Geo not to air the film after becoming a panel consultant and being influenced by a “co-conspirator,” the plaintiffs allege.
“The co-conspirator relayed to defendant Jensen ‘a litany of unsubstantiated rumors about [plaintiff] Jacobovici.’ Subsequently, defendant Jensen communicated through e-mails and telephone calls to ‘National Geographic company officials and other National Geographic panel members’ that she had ‘second thoughts’ about the documentary being aired,” the ruling states, citing court documents. “Defendant Jensen also allegedly passed on the rumors to National Geographic officials and panel members. Plaintiffs allege that defendant Jensen used ‘her position with Vanderbilt and her voice as a consultant to National Geographic’ to ‘put [plaintiffs] out of business.'”
Jacobovici and Associated Producers later sold the documentary to the Discovery Channel but they say that the release delay caused them financial harm and that they haven’t work for Nat Geo since Jensen damaged their relationship with the company.
U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly tossed claims against Vanderbilt on Tuesday but denied Jensen’s motion for dismissal or transfer. The court doesn’t have jurisdiction over the university because it wasn’t involved in the alleged contract interference, she ruled.
And more which do read. You have to hand it to Simcha, he doesn’t lack the tenacious gene. Unfortunately (for him anyway) it’s highly doubtful that any respectable scholar will take part in any project he’s involved with. Why would they. If they change their mind, he will sue them. And he will sue them too if they disagree with his conclusions.
Dear Simcha, drop your suits. Regain a fragment of a reputation.
Henry Smith, Jr., Director of Development for the Associates for Biblical Research, told Christian News Network that the [Tel Dan] inscription provides “powerful extra-biblical evidence that is in accord with the biblical presentation of David as the King of Israel.”
Well it does not such thing. But when you want to read into an inscription, it’s easy to do.
It’s a shame they didn’t actually contact an archaeologist or biblical scholar for their report. Simply citing Wright (out of context one might add and without availing themselves of his full treatment) to make a point is quite deceitful.
But all of this is old news- but I suppose necessary to bring to the fore just in time for Christmas. It’s quite the cynical move on their part – and made just in order to toss red meat at those unfamiliar with the technicalities of Aramaic, ancient inscriptions, artifacts, archaeology, epigraphy, and scholarship.
Oh Look, Just In Time for Christmas, The Story of the Galilean Synagogue Where Jesus ‘Likely’ Preached…
He [a priest] stands on what are likely ruins of the ancient town of Magdala, thought to be the home of Jesus’ best-known female disciple, Mary Magdalene. The waterline of Israel’s only sweet-water lake shimmers in the distance. It took his organization several years to buy and acquire permits for four adjacent plots of land on which to build a pilgrims’ hotel, an inter-faith chapel, a restaurant and a women’s shelter. But in Israel, archaeological excavations are compulsory before any construction can begin. When archeologists and volunteers started digging, they were astonished to find a treasure: A 1st-century synagogue, one of only seven in Israel – and in the entire world.
Ok. So far, so good. No issues. And then… the issues commence.
“This is the first synagogue ever excavated where Jesus walked and preached,” says the father, calling it “hugely important” for both Jews and Christians.
What, did they find a sign that said ‘Jesus spoke here’?
Experts say it’s highly likely that Jesus would have preached in the recently uncovered synagogue, believed to have first been built in the year 1 as a simple structure which was then upgraded into a more ornate one in the year 40. Until Tiberias was built, the only town on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee was Magdala.
Riggghhhhtttttttt…… What experts would those be? Come on guys. Come on.