As though the Old Testament has no meaning (or cannot be understood properly) without the New Testament when the truth is, the New Testament cannot be properly understood without the Old Testament.
Nope. You aren’t the first to notice something because you’re a brilliant exegete; you’re first to notice something that no one else ever has because you’re insane.
Again, the New Testament needs the Old to be understood; but the Old doesn’t need the New. So just let the Old Testament be the Word of God in its own right, ok? Bloody Marcionites.
Andrew Tobolowsky writes, among other things
In short, in trying to create a Museum of the Bible, the Greens have been unscrupulous and careless in collecting artifacts thereof. They have muddied the water that we desperately need to be clear because there are so few fish in it to begin with, and we are very hungry. Even a scrupulous Museum of the Bible constructed through the religious commitments that brought you Burwell v. Hobby Lobby would not be very good, and certainly not very informative. They could, however, at least try a little bit to collect real artifacts that are also actually for sale and not stolen. Honest mistakes, not so surprisingly, happen somewhat less often to people who make a little effort to avoid them, as the Museum never has, and may not in the future.
Give the whole a read. The Greens don’t have a fan in him.
For the field of papyrology this may be a moment of reckoning. One of their most distinguished luminaries—a MacArthur “genius grant” winner, no less—is alleged to have sold antiquities that he did not own. When I spoke to Nongbri in June he told me “If this isn’t a one-off thing, and there are more records of sales, it becomes harder to believe that other scholars who work closely with Dirk Obbink didn’t know this kind of thing was going on.” The scale of the problem, as Nongbri notes, is still undetermined. If items were illicitly leaving the Oxyrhynchus collection and being funneled through Baidun it’s possible that other items (and indeed dealers) are involved. Perhaps this is the tip of the iceberg. It’s also possible that other Oxyrhynchus papyri were sold to different U.S. buyers. Regardless of the scale of the problem, the fact that items could leave the collection at all demonstrates that there is a need for greater transparency in the administration of shared intellectual and cultural heritage.
Scholars… Some of you need Jesus. Your egos and your sense of entitlement are astonishing.
This is what happens:
This is what it looks like when a dilettante pretends to be an exegete. The text is misrepresented in order to preserve an ideological viewpoint.
Remember, just because a guy teaches at a Seminary doesn’t mean he knows what he’s talking about.
Watch the video of the false prophet falsely predict the Exile’s 4900 year duration.
This is what happens when you have a blind hermeneutical commitment and are unwilling to recognize your own error.
There’s an archaeologist who says he has discovered the very pillar in Jerusalem where Abram and Melchizedek met… Nope, not the Onion. Though by all rights it should be. With many thanks to Mark Elliott for pointing it out-
An Israeli archaeologist has uncovered the remains of an altar believed to be from around the time when Abraham met the high priest Melchizedek in Jerusalem.
Archaeologist Eli Shukron has spent much of his life looking for Bible history in the City of David. Shukron gave CBN News an exclusive look at what he feels is one of his most important discoveries kept under lock and key that dates back 4000 years – a stone pillar.
Blerg. Come on people. Come on. What possible evidence is there for such a claim? None, is the only appropriate answer.
Shukron says the pillar, found in the City of David, is just like the one described in Genesis 28 when Jacob had a dream in Bethel of a ladder reaching up to Heaven. After the dream, Jacob said, “How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven! Then Jacob rose early in the morning and took the stone that he had put at his head, set it up as a pillar, and poured oil on top of it.”
Shukron believes Melchizedek set a stone pillar up in Jerusalem just as Jacob did in Bethel.
Blerg. What rubbish. Read the rest if you enjoy migraines.
That’s not how prayer works. God hears the prayers he wants to hear, not prayers uttered because someone is using a book, any book. Lifeway, stop selling junk theology. Get some theologians on staff and stop thinking the latest marketing craze is good enough. Stetzer is gone. Stop acting like he would act.
How absurd. Next, they’ll put bags of garbage on display and call them Second Temple artifacts.
This is how you pander to a special interest group:
This is what happens when exegetes stop caring about the interpretation of scripture and find themselves looking for something to do to occupy their time: faddism and ‘WhatIfIsm’.
Except the first to announce the risen Lord were – from Mark, ‘a young man’ (and in fact the women ran from the tomb and said nothing!) and from the other gospels it was ‘angels’. It wasn’t the women who said ‘he is not here, he is risen’, in any of the gospels.
Maybe actually read the bible before you tell people to do something in the interests of biblical accuracy.
Dear Tom, just so you know, it’s not ‘Revelations’… It’s Revelation. Apparently NT Wright isn’t sure of the title of the book. In this video, at 4:23, he calls the Book of Revelation the “Book of Revelations”. How sad. F-
That’s right friends, Joel Osteen is the executive producer of the History Channel’s ‘Jesus: his Life’. Just fyi.
Upon hearing this news- Jesus reacted thusly- ======>
THE Biblical story of the Tower of Babel could be proved to be true after ancient remains were discovered in Iraq, an Amazon Prime documentary has claimed.
Amazon Prime’s Bible Conspiracy says ruins uncovered at the Borsippa archaeological site have similarities to the tale.
What these tragically ignorant souls don’t understand at all is that the tale of Babel is an etiological tale intending to explain the existence of Ziggurats and to explain the variety of languages. Accordingly, if some Ziggurat is discovered, it doesn’t prove the Tower existed, it proves Ziggurats did! Further, there is simply no way to demonstrate that any one Ziggurat is THE Tower. It’s all just mindless speculation by ignorant imaginers. And if you believe them, you deserve to be fooled.
Get your biblical scholarship from biblical scholars. Not nitwits on Amazon Prime.
Either way, the Turin Shroud Crowd simply cannot let it go…
In an attempt to prove that the Turin Shroud—a strip of linen that some people believe was used to wrap Jesus’s body after his crucifixion and carries the image of his face—is real, researchers have strapped human volunteers to a cross and drenched them in blood. Most mainstream scientists agree the shroud is a fake created in the 14th century,
The mock crucifixions are the most reliable recreations yet of the death of Jesus, the researchers suggest in an online abstract of a paper to be presented next week at a forensic science conference in Baltimore, Maryland (abstract E73 on p. 573 here). And they are the latest in a tit-for-tat series of tests, academic rebuttals, and furious arguments over the provenance—or lack thereof—of the centuries-old religious artifact. But the researchers hope the experiment will “support the hypothesis of Shroud authenticity in some new and unexpected ways.”
The research team from the Turin Shroud Center of Colorado in Colorado Springs would not comment on the crucifixion experiments before presenting them to the American Academy of Forensic Sciences’s (AAFS’s) annual meeting on 21 February. But the abstract describes “an experimental protocol by which special wrist and foot attachment mechanisms safely and realistically suspend the male subjects on a full-size cross.”
Bloody loons. In the words of ‘Frozen’, ‘Let it go….’ With thanks to Bible and Interpretation for the tip.
But if you can cite a source in Luther (and not just about Luther) I’d love to see it.