The issues are far more complex than simply sacraments, polity and authority. This is the most misinformed tweet I’ve yet seen on the Reformation. Only someone who has never studied the Reformation for more than a minute could suggest such.
Category Archives: pseudo-scholarship
These people should just stop. But they seem incapable of it, driven by some sort of demonically induced madness.
An Israeli Rabbi has claimed that the biblical prophecy of Balaam, which says that the appearance of a new star will precede the coming of the Messiah, matches an astronomical event that scientists predict will occur in 2022. Although the Jewish faith does not believe that Jesus is the Messiah, some Christians have interpreted the Rabbi’s prediction as proof that Jesus’ second coming will occur in 2022.
Rabbi Yosef Berger of King David’s Tomb on Mount Zion claimed that biblical prophecy of Balaam and “Jewish esoteric sources” show that the astronomical event predicted for 2022, the collision of two stars to form a brand new star in the night sky, will herald the arrival of the Messiah. The astronomical event fulfills an ancient prophetic sign of the coming of the Messiah, the Rabbi claimed, according to Breaking Israel News.
Rabbi Berger claimed that Balaam’s prophecy and other Jewish mystical sources say that the coming of the Messiah will be preceded by heavenly signs involving multiple stars. The ancient prophecy of the arrival of the Messiah matches recent predictions by astronomers that a dazzling display from a red nova explosion will appear in the sky in 2022, following the collision of two faint stars in the constellation of Cygnus, according to the Rabbi.
Lunacy. When 2022 comes and goes I hope this guy has the courage to admit he is a liar.
Or, a really poor thinker, which is what makes him a poor theologian. Wait, he isn’t a theologian at all. He’s the Pastor of a megachurch, where being a theologian is the last thing anyone wants.
Stanely’s recent remarks about the Virginal Conception (it’s not a Virgin Birth… that’s a biologically nonsensical phrase) of Jesus show that he doesn’t understand Scripture or Christian theology. But that’s to be expected, because the reason he says and does what he says and does isn’t to communicate truth, it’s to draw a crowd.
Stanley is, if I might put it quite crudely, exactly what every other megachurch pastor is- a publicity whore. He craves publicity and is willing to say and do whatever necessary to get it. Even if what he has to say is quite outrageous. But that’s the point, really. That’s what gets attention.
If a Christian asserts classic Christian belief, that’s not news. But if a pretend Christian says that he or she doesn’t believe in God or doesn’t think the Bible is true or theologically meaningful or, around Christmas, that Jesus is just like everyone else, then that gets the news juices flowing.
Attention whores love attention. Andy Stanley is an attention whore, not a theologian. His remarks should be taken in that light.
But that’s not theology, it’s heresy. It isn’t exposition, it’s eisegesis. Ya gotta love the guys who think that their navel gazing expositions and ‘reframings’ have merit and the publishers who pander to them simply because they address the latest societal buzzwords. Toss LGBTQ into any title or subtitle and the substance of your research can be utter nonsense and Westminster will still publish it.
Lifeway has sent along an email with the promise of 4 FREE sermon outlines and all I need do is download them…. Yay…. This is perfect for the lazy, unmotivated plagiarizing SBC pastors who are satisfied to let others do their sermon prep for them. Their name is Legion…
Fortunately, I like to do my own work. So, no thanks.
In the summer of 2016 Zondervan Academic became aware of emerging concerns that one of its authors, Dr. Peter T. O’Brien, may not have followed commonly accepted standards for the use and documentation of secondary resources in Bible commentaries he had written. Consequently, we began a careful review of Dr. O’Brien’s commentary on Colossians and Philemon, volume 44 in the Word Biblical Commentary (WBC).
It is with sadness and regret that we have concluded this volume does not follow commonly accepted standards for the use and documentation of secondary resources. Dr. O’Brien is revered by his colleagues in the academy and by his former students. His commentaries, including volume 44 in the WBC, have been used with great benefit by the thousands who have purchased them. While we have no reason to believe that Dr. O’Brien intentionally misused secondary resources, our commitment to high publishing standards leaves us no choice but to put volume 44 of the WBC out of print in both its print and digital formats and to destroy the remaining inventory.
Plagiarism…. see how bad it sucks.