R. C. Sproul vs. Rudolf Bultmann (via Scotteriology)

Clearly Bultmann is victorious. And correct. Sproul, eh, not so much.  The Bible isn’t a science text book and those who take it as such twist its meaning into unnatural shapes and the distortions born from those unnatural shapes are wretched beasts neither true nor valuable.

In promoting his new book Unseen Realities: Heaven, Hell, Angels and Demons, R. C. Sproul claims, “”I believe that if we are to be consistent Christians, believing all of the Bible rather than portions of it, we must recognize that the supernatural places and beings described on its pages are real. There is an uncompromised supernaturalism at the heart of the Christian worldview, and we must not let the world’s skepticism with regard to these thi … Read More

via Scotteriology

1 thought on “R. C. Sproul vs. Rudolf Bultmann (via Scotteriology)

  1. On the other hand, Bultmann is generally respectful and humble towards those who still buy into a “mythical” worldview, as may be amply seen in his sincere kindness towards Karl Barth.

    Like

Comments are closed.