In 2009, the University of Sheffield proposed to close the Department of Biblical Studies, perhaps the world’s foremost and most innovative biblical studies department.
The response included a barrage of letters protesting the plan from academics worldwide. Many of the letters are preserved on the Save Biblical Studies website. Responding to these protests, the University promised to retain the Department of Biblical Studies and to strengthen it.
But as early as 2014, the University of Sheffield again decided to disband the Department. The Department no longer exists, and current academic staff are now employed to a “Research Institute for Biblical Studies“, which has been interpreted as a short-term stop-gap measure before biblical studies at Sheffield ceases completely.
But what about all those academic protests? Did they count for nothing? Not at all. The letters of protest have been mined by the University of Sheffield, and used as marketing endorsements for biblical studies at Sheffield.
Appallingly, the University has taken letters of protest, culled them, edited out bits, and then made use of them as though they were promotions of the new Research unit-
All of these endorsements were culled from the letters of protest written in 2009 against the closure of the Department. They are now being used as “endorsements” of the University of Sheffield after the closure of the Department. To be clear, the protests are all being callously misrepresented as unqualified positive statements about biblical studies at Sheffield University.
Read the whole evidentiary piece here. I’ve never been more dismayed by an academic institution before. Someone is a deceiver at Sheffield and worse than Mark Driscoll in his or her misuse of material.
UPDATE: Here’s a screenshot of the cropped and misleading quotes, for that inevitable moment when the University yanks that segment of its page.
To misquote a dead man – that is a new low….
LikeLike
indeed. in academia, i’ve never seen lower
LikeLike
This is disgusting. Will this institution lie about anything?
LikeLike
Original now yanked. Predictable and dumb!
LikeLike
Place your bets! How long before a statement of apology for “an administrative error” or something equally banal and false is released from HR representatives?
I can no longer take the University of $heffield seriously.
#ShameOnSheffield
LikeLike
Thanks for posting on this, Jim. I found this pretty shocking. One important qualifier, though, which suggests that this is more inept than callous: it looks like the page in question was actually a survivor from the earlier department website, i.e. it was crafted while the department was still afloat and while Maurice was still alive. The page dates back to at least May 2013 — https://web.archive.org/web/20130521145642/http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/biblicalstudies/research/about
LikeLike
True but the endorsements have been edited and the context now for them is totally innappropriate
LikeLike
Thanks, Jim. I entirely agree about the new context for them – totally inappropriate. And it’s inept to boot. I don’t think they were edited further, though, since they appeared in (at latest) May 2013.
LikeLike
it is a glorious failure.
LikeLike
I’m really upset they used my protest letter. I praised the legacy of the dept as it existed in 2009, not what the university thinks would be a valid replacement in 2014, or whenever they posted this. I certainly think that is really dishonest to use my words to attract students to the university now.
LikeLike
i agree james. they have taken letters intended for one purpose and manipulated them to address another.
LikeLike