Ignorant Persistence, or Persistent Ignorance

Either way, the Turin Shroud Crowd simply cannot let it go

In an attempt to prove that the Turin Shroud—a strip of linen that some people believe was used to wrap Jesus’s body after his crucifixion and carries the image of his face—is real, researchers have strapped human volunteers to a cross and drenched them in blood. Most mainstream scientists agree the shroud is a fake created in the 14th century,

The mock crucifixions are the most reliable recreations yet of the death of Jesus, the researchers suggest in an online abstract of a paper to be presented next week at a forensic science conference in Baltimore, Maryland (abstract E73 on p. 573 here). And they are the latest in a tit-for-tat series of tests, academic rebuttals, and furious arguments over the provenance—or lack thereof—of the centuries-old religious artifact. But the researchers hope the experiment will “support the hypothesis of Shroud authenticity in some new and unexpected ways.”

The research team from the Turin Shroud Center of Colorado in Colorado Springs would not comment on the crucifixion experiments before presenting them to the American Academy of Forensic Sciences’s (AAFS’s) annual meeting on 21 February. But the abstract describes “an experimental protocol by which special wrist and foot attachment mechanisms safely and realistically suspend the male subjects on a full-size cross.”

Bloody loons.  In the words of ‘Frozen’, ‘Let it go….’  With thanks to Bible and Interpretation for the tip.

2 thoughts on “Ignorant Persistence, or Persistent Ignorance

  1. Antonio Lombatti 19 Feb 2019 at 11:45 am

    I’ve hung up my pen, retired, got sick of all this crap. But I’ve left on the battlefield more talented scholars than me 😉 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/…/10.1111/1556-4029.13867

    Like

    • Jim 19 Feb 2019 at 11:46 am

      no one is more talented than you

      Like

Comments are closed.