It’s A Fake

An enigmatic sculpture of a king’s head dating back nearly 3,000 years has set off a modern-day mystery caper as scholars try to figure out whose face it depicts.

No.  It’s a fake.  Look at the thing.  It’s a modern fake.

The 2-inch sculpture is an exceedingly rare example of figurative art from the Holy Land during the 9th century B.C. — a period associated with biblical kings. Exquisitely preserved but for a bit of missing beard, nothing quite like it has been found before.

‘Preserved’… LOL.  IT’S A MODERN FAKE.

While scholars are certain the stern bearded figure donning a golden crown represents royalty, they are less sure which king it symbolizes, or which kingdom he may have ruled.   Archaeologists unearthed the diminutive figurine in 2017 during excavations at a site called Abel Beth Maacah, located just south of Israel’s border with Lebanon, near the modern-day town of Metula.


In a rare move, archaeologists and curators at the Israel Museum in Jerusalem rushed to put the piece on public display. A detailed report is set for publication in the June edition of the journal Near Eastern Archaeology.

‘Rare move… rushed…’ HAHAHAHAHA.  These days rubbish is ballyhooed the second it’s found.  Just ask Karen King…

Eran Arie, the Israel Museum’s curator of Iron Age and Persian archaeology, said the discovery was one of a kind. “In the Iron Age, if there’s any figurative art, and there largely isn’t, it’s of very low quality. And this is of exquisite quality.”

Because Carbon-14 dating cannot give a more exact date for the statue’s creation other than sometime in the 9th century, the field of potential candidates is large. Yahalom-Mack posited it could be kings Ben Hadad or Hazael of Damascus, Ahab or Jehu of Israel, or Ithobaal of Tyre, all characters appearing in the biblical narrative.

Carbon dating huh… ok.   FAKE.  But, hey, ‘proof’ of the Bible… so the BAR mob will love it.

About Jim

I am a Pastor, and Lecturer in Church History and Biblical Studies at Ming Hua Theological College.
This entry was posted in pseudo-archaeology. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to It’s A Fake

  1. John Poirier says:

    Unlike most fakes, this one has a provenance in a University-directed dig. So I’m inclined to think it’s not a fake. One article even says that the clump of dirt in which it was found was shown to be ancient–and that would take some real trickery if this thing’s a fake.


    • Jim says:

      trickery is what the forgers do. anyway, these days, i think our default position should be skepticism and everything should be viewed a fake until it’s PROVEN to be authentic instead of blindly accepting claims made in the media. that approach has gotten a lot of scholars a lot of egg on their faces.

      indeed, the default position of scholars should ALWAYS be skepticism. an object is guilty of being fraudulent until it is proven innocent.


Comments are closed.