And it’s a doozy… But unsurprising in these here troubled times…
Ulrich K. writes
“Diese Sichtweise passt zu einem modernen Mainstream-Christentum, das den biblischen Gott von allen verstörenden, widersprüchlichen und abgründigen Zügen reinigen will”, schreibt Körtner in seinem Kommentar. “Das Gottesbild wird nach den Maßstäben heutiger Moral passend gemacht und die Theodizeefrage – die Frage also nach Gottes Güte und Gerechtigkeit angesichts des Bösen und des Leidens – durch fromme Floskeln überdeckt.”
#Bam. Read the rest. The Pontiff should stick to whatever it is he was trained in and not dabble in interpretive issues.
A pastor from back in the late 70s of the church a friend is at told him that one year he received a Christmas card from a member. It said, “Pastor, the best Christmas present you could give our church is your resignation!”
It seems that member sort of missed the whole point.
It took ten years constant and vigilant police oversight with combined moral and spiritual education to secure to Calvin his triumph over the intrigues of parties and the hatred of base born men. From 1545 to 1555 he felt the utmost venom of their opposition.
At one time he almost despaired and, December 14, 1547, wrote to Farel: “Affairs are in such a state of confusion that I despair of being able longer to retain the Church, at least by my own endeavors.” His opponents were of the same crowd who drove him away in 1538, and though they afterwards submitted, and in the case of one or two, even joined in the invitation for his return, yet under the fretting of his harsh discipline they began serious and offensive resistance.
They nicknamed him “Cain,” and named dogs after him; they threatened him in the pulpit, and fired guns off under his windows; even trying on one occasion to wrest from his hands the sacred elements at the Eucharist. Only an extraordinary man could have resisted the pressure.*
Just remember that the next time your Elders or Deacons call you up and tell you you’re a failure. At least they aren’t naming their dogs after you… or…. are they?
RT Stevenson, John Calvin: The Statesman, p. 137.
Theologian Michael Bird (Ridley College) appeared on Australian national television last night, talking about Jesus’ erections.
Here’s the rush transcript of Michael Bird discussing the rigidity of Our Lord’s penis with ABC interviewer, Tom Ballard:
Michael Bird: I’ll tell you a real funny story. I taught religious education to some students … and I asked them a very provocative question. I said to them, ‘Did Jesus ever have an erection?’
Tom Ballard: ‘Did Jesus ever have an erection?’?
Michael Bird: I believe he did.
Tom Ballard: Multiple erections.
Michael Bird: Throughout the course of his life.
Tom Ballard: Would he have had an orgasm?
Michael Bird: I don’t know. He may have had, he probably had a nocturnal emission as a teenager.
Tom Ballard: OK.
Michael Bird: We all have…
Tom Ballard: Would he have… helped that along, if he was a red-blooded, normal man?
Michael Bird: What do you mean by…
View original post 445 more words
Lest we forget…