Daily Archives: 1 Feb 2017
There may be the remains of external devotion where there is nothing but the ruins of real virtue. – Matthew Henry
“How great is the presumption and security of the world! Whoever thinks he’s something dares to scoff at Christ and lift his foot against him. It’ll get even worse; epicureanism will make great headway. For contempt of the Word, which is characteristic of this world and believes neither in God nor in a life to come, is nothing else than a preparation for epicureanism before the last day”. — Martin Luther
UPDATE: And the winner is…. Jason! Email me your address, J.
The volume of essays Crossley and I edited is now available for your reading pleasure.
As biblical studies becomes increasingly fragmented, this collection of essays brings together a number of leading scholars in order to show how historical reconstruction, philology, metacriticism, and reception history can be part of a collective vision for the future of the field.
This collection of essays focuses more specifically on critical questions surrounding the construction of ancient Israel(s), ‘minimalism’, the ongoing significance of lexicography, the development of early Judaism, orientalism, and the use of the Bible in contemporary political discourses. Contributors include John van Seters, Niels Peter Lemche, Ingrid Hjelm, and Philip R. Davies.
You’ll really enjoy it, I promise. And if you don’t have a copy, but would like a copy, you can win a copy. Here’s how:
- 1- Tell me why you want it.
- 2- Tell me why you deserve it.
- 3- Tell me where you live.
- 4- Tell me who your favorite New Testament Scholar is.
- 5- Tell me who your favorite Old Testament Scholar is.
- 6- Tell me who your favorite Reformer is.
- 7- Share this post on twitter.
That’s it. Best answer wins. You have a week to do it. Contest ends tomorrow.
And at the conclusion of the Marburg Colloquy, after the participants left because of the outbreak of a minor plague in Marburg, the Landgrave wrote Zwingli in February and confirmed his agreement with the Zuricher on all points. As Jackson notes
Writing to Zwingli on February 1, 1530, the Landgrave renews his acceptance of the Zwinglian position throughout (cf. viii., 405). So there was at least one convert to the Zwinglian side made or confirmed by the Colloquy.*
Luther’s position wasn’t just unconvincing to Zwingli and Oecolampadius and all sensible people since, it was also unconvincing to his own Prince.
*S. Jackson, Huldreich Zwingli: The Reformer of German Switzerland (1484–1531).