Daily Archives: 25 Oct 2016

The Bee Stings the Seeker Sensitives and their Dislike of Words like ‘Sin’

According to sources, local pastor Ryan Ferguson is being required by his church leadership team to attend a six-week seeker sensitivity training course after “carelessly” mentioning “unwelcoming” concepts like sin, hell, and repentance to his congregation in a recent Sunday sermon.

The sensitivity training, hosted by a Seattle megachurch, reportedly instructs its students over a period of six weeks in the proper way to effectively grow their churches without using triggering words or offensive concepts present in the Bible. At the end of a successfully completed course load, the megachurch promises its students will be “ready to engage the world for Christ while being very careful about which facets of Christ to present.”

Etc.  Given the current climate it isn’t hard to imagine this actually taking place.

AAR Has Announced this Year’s Annual Meeting Uniform Jacket for Men

Or, more precisely, for those who self identify as males- not that there’s anything wrong with self identifying as absolutely anything else.  That’s completely up to you.  And naturally these are just guidelines that no one is expected to take as restrictive or prohibitive.   That said, if you identify as male (whatever that means to you, hey it’s your business, you decide), then here’s the jacket of the year:


Isn’t it fantastic!  Get yours today.  If you want to.  No one is forcing you to and if you feel for even a moment like your safe space has been invaded then we invite you to send your Change.org petition link to us protesting our men’s (whatever that means) jacket suggestion so that we can publicize it on your behalf.

A ‘How to’ Guide for the Publicity Hungry ‘Christian’

These days there’s nothing easier for the publicity questing news hungry than getting your name plastered all over Religion News Service (@RNS).

  • Deny any vestige of orthodox Christian faith.  That means be pro marriage equality, anti conservative values, and anti biblical literacy.
  • Replace the Bible with ‘your view’.  Scripture will just cause you problems, so it’s best if you ignore it.  But if you must discuss it, eisegete, eisegete, eisegete.
  • Be anything but a theologian.  RNS dislikes actual theologians and you will hardly ever see one cited or discussed.  Instead, your profession of choice must be ‘journalist’ or ‘Christian author’.  ESPECIALLY if you’re of the female persuasion.  You’re a shoe in if you are anything but a white male theological type.  The less theological training you actually have, the better!  Hells bells, if you’ve never read a page of theology, you’re king of the land, king of the blind, leader in the land of the blind!

That’s it.  Those three steps will ensure that, as soon as you tweet or write, RNS will pick it up and spew it across their pages and social media.

The Bee Stings Hillary Clinton’s Notion of Religious Freedom

Greetings, Christians of America.

I am running for President of the United States and I am writing today to ask for your vote.

I know I do not have the best track record with religious voters. I understand that your rights as Christians are of utmost importance to you, as you feel them being suffocated in the current American landscape. You are concerned about the cultural tide rising against your values. You are worried about the force of the government coming against the practice of your deeply held beliefs. There is tension in the air that everyone can feel.

But it doesn’t have to be this way, my Christian friends.

I want to make it clear to you that a vote for me is a vote for a quick, clean death for your religious liberty.

The aforementioned death is already coming, to be sure. The dominoes are falling. There is no need to be upset or bitter about it. Nothing you can do will cause so much as a stumble in the ferocious march of the New Tolerance.

There is no need to drag this out any longer than we have to. You fought hard, and you fought nobly—but your time in this country is done. Enough with the death throes. What I am offering is a merciful end to your arduous struggle.

Aren’t you tired of fighting for a protected voice in the public square? Wouldn’t you like to put to bed the anxieties about what religious rights your children and grandchildren will have? Wouldn’t it be great to not have to worry about the extent to which the government will force you to violate your faith and conscience by mandate?

My vow to you is closure and rest. No more struggling. No more worry. As president, I will grant your religious liberty a quick, clean death.

That is my solemn promise to you.


US Consumerist Higher Ed Slammed in Britain


Americans embraced the marketisation of higher education, with profit-making colleges and debt-laden customers. The result has been corruption and failure.

100% true.

Things get complicated when we liken students to customers. As early as 400 BC, Socrates understood that doing so was a mistake. Establishing such a relationship creates “merchants of knowledge,” as he put it, who are willing to give students what they want rather than what they need in order to keep the money flowing. Introducing this market-based exchange, explained Socrates, had a corrupting effect on the teaching and learning process. If only we had listened.

We’ve had this lesson again and again. In the 19th century for-profit business colleges in the US claimed to offer students the moon. But the British parliament blasted these institutions for “unprincipled exploitation” and called them a “disgrace and discredit” to an “honourable profession”.

A similar conclusion was reached by the medical (pdf) and legal professions of the late-19th and early-20th centuries. They too believed that for-profit, market-based strategies eroded professional, ethical and academic standards. The strategies, investigators concluded, produced shady institutions that were more interested in a quick return than anything else.

100% true.  Read the whole.  And, world, don’t do what we’ve done.  Don’t. Do. It.

I Appreciate the Thought, But…

I don’t have an ecumenical bone in my body.  Sure, I think Christians should get along and all that and work together in the world- but trying to re-unify and all that rot; Lutherans talking with the Vatican or the Vatican talking to the Orthodox Patriarch in hopes of some sort of theological concord is, to me, as absurd as trying to put the toothpaste back into the tube.  If it happens, more is lost than gained.  So a volume on ecumenical theology is as interesting to me as a book by Joel Osteen.

And ‘missions’… well that topic has been hashed to death.  The only missional plan that has ever worked or will ever work is normal Christian folk actually living their faith where they are each and every day and sharing the Good News with their neighbors and co-workers as the opportunity arises.  That’s it.  If your ‘missional scheme’ extends beyond that, it deserves nothing but mockery.


So, while I appreciate being sent these two volumes- I will never review them because I will never read them.  There’s too much to read as it is that fascinates me- so I’m not about to waste time reading volumes that I would dislike immensely simply because of their subject matter.

Thank you, and good day, sir.

If You’re Anywhere Near the University of ‘Glascow’…

Be sure to drop in for their udderly enthralling highly academic lecture series……….


Just be sure you don’t accidentally go to the University of Glasgow.  It’s not the same.

All Things Made New: The Reformation and its Legacy

All Things Made New: The Reformation and its Legacy.

9780190616816The most profound characteristic of Western Europe in the Middle Ages was its cultural and religious unity, a unity secured by a common alignment with the Pope in Rome, and a common language – Latin – for worship and scholarship. The Reformation shattered that unity, and the consequences are still with us today. In All Things Made New, Diarmaid MacCulloch, author of the New York Times bestseller Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years, examines not only the Reformation’s impact across Europe, but also the Catholic Counter-Reformation and the special evolution of religion in England, revealing how one of the most turbulent, bloody, and transformational events in Western history has shaped modern society.

The Reformation may have launched a social revolution, MacCulloch argues, but it was not caused by social and economic forces, or even by a secular idea like nationalism; it sprang from a big idea about death, salvation, and the afterlife. This idea – that salvation was entirely in God’s hands and there was nothing humans could do to alter his decision – ended the Catholic Church’s monopoly in Europe and altered the trajectory of the entire future of the West.

By turns passionate, funny, meditative, and subversive, All Things Made New takes readers onto fascinating new ground, exploring the original conflicts of the Reformation and cutting through prejudices that continue to distort popular conceptions of a religious divide still with us after five centuries. This monumental work, from one of the most distinguished scholars of Christianity writing today, explores the ways in which historians have told the tale of the Reformation, why their interpretations have changed so dramatically over time, and ultimately, how the contested legacy of this revolution continues to impact the world today.

The nice folk at Oxford Uni Press have sent a gratis review copy without any expectation of a positive or uplifting review.  For which I thank them.

Diarmaid MacCulloch has written widely on the history of Christianity and more specifically numerous studies of English Church history.  In his latest book, All Things Made New: The Reformation and its Legacy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), MacCulloch collects previously published essays in a volume that can only be described as utterly superb.  Comprised of three major sections, 1) ‘Reformations Across Europe’; 2) ‘The English Reformation’; and 3) ‘Looking Back on the English Reformation’, the essays herein challenge basic assumptions and provide compelling arguments for seeing the Reformation in general and the English Reformation in particular in a stunning new light.

M. has a gift for effervescent prose and that gift manifests itself on every page and in every paragraph.  For example

This … reflected Erasmus’s distaste for lay devotion; for all his loudly proclaimed vision of the labourer reading the Bible at the ploughtail, and his strictures on the clericalism of his age, he was profoundly repelled when he observed the everyday reality of Western Christiandom’s layfolk grasping at the sacred.  His nausea would become naturalized in Protestantism, particularly in its Reformed variety (p. 34).

It’s impossible for me to present this book to you for your consideration without doing so in terms that are not only glowing but might even be taken as fawning.  Many books have been written on countless aspects of the Reformation and 2017, the 500th anniversary of Luther’s efforts, will see a virtual flood of them.  But it is extremely doubtful that very many of them, if any, will plumb the depths of intellectual inquiry with the masterful skill MacCulloch seems to command with the sort of ease the rest of us use to command the tv remote.

Perhaps best of all, the volume is extremely affordable.  Consequently, it belongs in the personal library of every student of Christian history, from the specialist to the student to the interested lay person.  It also belongs in your local library.  And it deserves to be read.  Really read.  Thoroughly read.  Joyfully read.

As the voice of heaven said to St Augustine in the garden one lovely morning, tolle, lege, so too I whisper to you.  No,rather, I shout it to you from the rooftops.  TOLLE, LEGE!

Don’t Give What’s Holy to Dogs- Calvin on the Supper

I am prepared to die rather than cast the holy bread to dogs. –  John Calvin

Calvin made this statement in the midst of conflict with the Genevan city council regarding distribution of the Supper’s elements to anyone who wished it.  Calvin  refused.

Small wonder today’s gentle snowflakes find Calvin so offensive.  He would tell them no.  They don’t like no.