Daily Archives: 9 Oct 2016

Tim Stanley Makes The Point About Trump in A Few Paragraphs

What a depressing state of affairs. American democracy has been hijacked by a political arsonist – a man with little regard for his party or America’s democratic institutions, who has treated the voters in much the same way that he fantasised about treating women. And it was all, I suspect, a fantasy.

It’s worth watching the video in full. He boasts that as a famous man he can kiss and even touch women at will. But when we see him greeted by an attractive TV actress, he doesn’t actually do it. The camera is rolling of course, but why would that stop a true Casanova?

He talks to her in a flirty way. She looks like she’s heard every line before. That’s it. The reality is that Trump’s bravado camouflages inadequacy. He probably doesn’t have as much money as he says. He almost certainly doesn’t have a plan to beat the Islamists in Syria. He can’t string a coherent thought together.

He has raised some good, necessary issues that affect the working-class. But by behaving like a parody, he has turned them into a parody, too.

The Republican Party, meanwhile, is left with what? The growing certainty of defeat, a fear that Trump will lose them congressional seats, too. Worse, they have undone their own aspirations to make America a cleaner place. Anyone who thinks you can’t serve God and Mammon hasn’t seen the Republican Party lately.

Read the article.  Tim Stanley has seen things as they are.  That’s a rarity these days.

America and the Christian

Don’t act like you want America to be a better place when you cant even manage to live out your own faith on Sunday morning.  If God matters that little to you, you surely can’t imagine he, or his will, will mean anything to anyone else.

Voting and the Christian

I think I’ve concluded that if you can’t vote FOR someone you shouldn’t vote at all. If you vote for one because you hate the other more your vote is literally an act of hatred.  Which, for Christians anyway, should raise all manner of red flags and warning bells.

Wikileaks is the Wikipedia of News

I.e., filled with egregious made up inexpert rubbish contributed by biased and ignorant dilettantes wishing to perpetuate their own ridiculous notions to further their own agenda.

The latest release from WikiLeaks, a collection of emails supposedly hacked from the account of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, is getting very little public attention due to the fact that it contains nothing particularly scandalous to begin with, and the fact that it was released just as Donald Trump’s campaign was imploding in a sexual assault scandal. But those who have examined the Clinton email dump have found something fascinating: several of the emails aren’t real, and aren’t even good forgeries.

If your source has ‘wiki’ anywhere in the title and its contributors go by screen names rather than their own actual names … beware.

Jacob Neusner Has Died

UPDATE (Previously posted 8 October)- Now the news has hit the Jewish media.

neusnerWord is spreading amongst the guildmembers that Neusner has died.  May he rest in peace indeed.  I will try to update with further details when they become available.

 

America Right Now

america

Zwingli’s Rejection of the Mass: Today with Zwingli

Huldrychi Zvinglii de canone missae libelli apologia ad Theobaldum Geroldseggium Eremi Suitensium administratorem.

Cogit me inconsulta indulgentia, ut quidam putant, quę tamen inconsulta non fuit, quemadmodum manifeste intelliges, vir celeberrime, tam mature ac fere in ipso nixu, hanc apologiam dati ad te canonis scribere. Sunt enim, qui vereantur, ne quidam, nomini nostro addictiores, eis quę nos infirmis pia quadam indulgentia donavimus pervicacius hęreant; quę tamen nisi prorsus aboleantur, priscam sint abominationem velut postliminio reductura.

So commences this October 9, 1523 Flugschrift on the Mass. Compared to other works of Zwingli on the topic this one is quite brief. Indeed, it is a mere 6 pages- but contains, in brief, everything that Zwingli would flesh out for the next 6 years climaxing in his works related to (before and after) the Marburg Colloquy.

Below is the first edition- courtesy the brilliant folk at the Zurich Central Library

cogit

Worth knowing are the circumstances which led Zwingli to produce this little ‘appendix’ (that’s what it is) just a few days after his larger treatment of the Mass. As Jackson notes

Caution was Zwingli’s characteristic. He would move no faster than public sentiment approved. Yet he did his best to form such sentiment. He prepared the way for the change and then quietly let things come to a crisis. So it was with the radical matter of using the vernacular for the Church services; Zwingli advocated it, but Leo Jud, in the baptism of a child in the Great Minster, August 10, 1523, first introduced it, and then when Zwingli found it was popular, he proceeded to reform the liturgy and unfold his novel teaching respecting it.

In his treatise on “The Canon of the Mass,” —dated IV. Cal. Septemb. (i. e., September 2) 1523—the canon is that part of the mass liturgy in which the words of the institution appear, and is therefore doctrinally the storm centre of discussion respecting it—he enunciates the doctrine now so commonly associated with his name that the Eucharist is not a mystery but a ministry, the atmosphere is not awe but love, the result is not infusion of grace but of enthusiasm; we remember Christ, and the thought of His presence stirs us to fresh exertion in His service.

He proposed a substitute for the Latin prayers which still more strikingly would set forth these teachings. Yet, characteristically he made no innovation himself at once. His books, however, laid down principles which logically followed out would oblige a complete break with the Old Church. Yet, so slow was he to make changes that on October 9, 1523, he actually defended himself against the charge that he retained the Old Church ceremonies—the use of the cross, vestments, choir-singing, etc.,—because he liked them!

The Curious Reason Evangelicals Support Trump: SCOTUS

Every time one of the people who supports Trump mentions reasons the chief is always ‘the next POTUS will be appointing at least one, and probably more members of the Supreme Court and he will appoint Conservatives’.

Two questions:  How do you know he will appoint more than one?  And even if he appoints one or nine, what makes you think he’s telling the truth about the sort of Justices he will appoint?

How can, in sum, you trust a pathological liar to do anything he says he will do?

Oh, you say, he isn’t a liar?  You’re wrong of course.  He has proven himself to be a liar time after time.  Just ask the thousands of people he stiffed in business, promising to do one thing and then doing another.  Promising to pay a certain sum and then shorting the payment by hundreds and thousands and tens of thousands.

Your Trump trust is unfounded.  It’s time to tell the truth (as I’ve said before).  The real reason you support Trump is because you hate Clinton more than you love the truth.