#TISsowhite? Reflections on Daniel Kirk’s Broadside

06 Oct

#Bam- Kirk gets taken to school.

Biblical Reasoning

Daniel Kirk has a post that has been making the rounds this week in which he connects the theological interpretation of Scripture (TIS) movement with something he calls the “problem of whiteness.” Leaving aside questions about whether or not we can speak of TIS as a singular coherent “movement,” let’s consider the thrust of Kirk’s argument. As I understand it, Kirk appears to be arguing that the TIS movement, unlike other “situated” readings (such as feminist, African American, and LGBT readings), has failed to own up to its own “revisionist” approach to Scripture and that this failure is owing to the general “whiteness” of the movement–presumably TIS advocates are mostly white males who are not accustomed to locating their scholarship within a particular perspective. As Kirk puts it:

White, western theology has sat at the center of biblical interpretation for so long that all of our debates can only be about what the text…

View original post 911 more words

Comments Off on #TISsowhite? Reflections on Daniel Kirk’s Broadside

Posted by on 6 Oct 2016 in Modern Culture


Comments are closed.