‘Evangelicals’ hate Hillary Clinton more than they love morals and ethics. And their much vaunted and ballyhooed disdain for the immoral doings of Bill Clinton are conveniently ignored in Donald Trump precisely because defeating Clinton has become THE agenda for them.
And it’s this.
Do yourself a favor and listen to NPR’s Fresh Air evisceration of the selfish greed driven Trump from today’s show.
“When the disciples were increasing in number, a complaint arose… ” (Acts 6:1). Always somebody that’s not happy when things are going well. – Jerry Ireland
James Spinti has discovered that the ancient Akkadians had their own version of the ‘prosperity Gospel’! That’s right- there’s nothing new under the sun- not even the nonsense spewed by Paula White, Benny Hinn, Joel Osteen, and Oprah Winfrey!
One piece of evidence that a supernatural connection empowering causative speech lies with the speech itself is the attention given to precise performance. Instructions are quite specific: certain oral rites are to be repeated three or seven times and accompanied by particular acts or gestures. As Sørensen argues, this emphasis on precision indicates that at least a degree of supernatural power (or as he puts it, “magical agency”) inheres in the speech itself. The speech is being used as a “sort of material object” required for ritual efficacy, rather than (merely) as communication. Stereotypy and special prosodic features such as alliteration provide further evidence for the use of speech as a tool.—Forestalling Doom page 89
Congratulations, ‘prosperity’ deceivers- you have very ancient roots (even though you wouldn’t know the difference between Akkadian and Sumerian if your life depended on it).
And he isn’t a supporter of Trump either. Clearly.
Look, GOP, you have a serious problem with Trump. Three of your leading thinkers (Krauthammer and George Will and David Brooks) think him a fool. Why, then, does he still have support?
John Barton’s one of the best scholars in the world and nothing he does can be overlooked by people interested in the Hebrew Bible. Nothing.
This book brings together some of the world’s most exciting scholars from across a variety of disciplines to provide a concise and accessible guide to the Hebrew Bible. It covers every major genre of book in the Old Testament together with in-depth discussions of major themes such as human nature, covenant, creation, ethics, ritual and purity, sacred space, and monotheism. This authoritative overview sets each book within its historical and cultural context in the ancient Near East, paying special attention to its sociological setting. It provides new insights into the reception of the books and the different ways they have been studied, from historical-critical enquiry to modern advocacy approaches such as feminism and liberation theology. It also includes a guide to biblical translations and textual criticism and helpful suggestions for further reading.
Featuring contributions from experts with backgrounds in the Jewish and Christian faith traditions as well as secular scholars in the humanities and social sciences, The Hebrew Bible is the perfect starting place for anyone seeking a user-friendly introduction to the Old Testament, and an invaluable reference book for students and teachers.
The publisher has sent along a review copy without any expectation concerning the results of said review.
The volume is comprised of three major divisions each with contributions from some of the sharpest minds in Hebrew Bible/ Old Testament studies presently active; many of whom are members of SOTS, the premier academic society of scholars of the Old Testament.
John Barton gets the ball rolling with his introduction (and for the record, instead of repeating the section titles and essay titles here, I’ll simply remind readers that all of that is available at the link above). In it, he sets the stage and suggests the reasons why students of Scripture should concern themselves with the present work and the issues it raises and states that the purpose of the collection is to re-integrate biblical studies into the wider contemporary cultural context. To that end Part One and the four issues it contains all attempt to describe the historical and social context of the Hebrew Bible.
Barton’s essay in Part One is extremely good but Francesca’s essay is, I have to say, worth the price of the volume. It should, in fact, be required reading for every graduate and undergraduate student of the Old Testament. It is – to use an overused phrase but one which in this case is absolutely accurate – critically important.
Part Two turns in a more traditional direction (in terms of the classic ‘introduction to the Old Testament’) and Römer and company do the normal and necessary things which are required to introduce students to texts. The ‘narrative books’ (the Pentateuch, the Deuteronomistic History, and the Chronicler along with Ezra/Nehemiah) are set in their ancient contexts before Kratz takes on the prophetic literature and the other literary types are described and contextualized by other historians.
Part three is the most ‘theological’ portion of the book or perhaps the most ‘religion-historical’. The more important topics of the Old Testament are compartmentalized in a way that the ancient Israelites never would have done and in fact never did do. Nonetheless, such compartmentalizations help modern readers come to terms with what the Bible is on about when it talks about God as the ‘only God’ and when the human condition is the central concern of this passage or that or how rituals were to be performed and how sin atoned and where and when. So, for instance, Crouch does a superb job in her description and discussion of ‘Ethics’, writing
The biblical texts preserve a remarkable diversity of opinions on matters ethical (p. 353).
This is actually a critical truth that applies not only to the ethics of the texts but of the theology, or more accurately, the theologies of the text. Indeed, the Old Testament doesn’t have ‘a theology’ (or ‘an ethics’ or ‘a prophetic emphasis’) but rather a variety of theologies, and ethics, and prophetic emphases. And that is precisely what Crouch and the other contributors do such a good job of highlighting.
The old models of doing Old Testament studies were to try to find a ‘center’ or organizing principle around which the entire text congeals. So, for instance, for von Rad the center of the Old Testament was the ‘history of salvation’. For Eichrodt, it was ‘covenant’. As useful as such concepts were, they were, and are, ultimately wrong. The Old Testament isn’t Kansas. It’s Colorado. It isn’t flat, it’s mountainous and it is comprised not of a single terrain but every imaginable contour.
The virtue of the present volume is that it helps readers of the Hebrew Bible see the colors and contours of the texts found within that ancient collection. And that’s simply exciting.
The volume concludes, though, with an eye opening essay by Curtis titled ‘To Map or Not to Map’. In it the differences between geographical and theological mappings are highlighted. For instance
The reader of Mic 4:1 will realize that statements such as “The mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established as the highest of the mountains and shall be raised above the hills” are envisaging a remarkable change in the very nature of things. Clearly the hill on which the Temple was built was not as high as some of those overlooking the city, such as the Mount of Olives. This is again theological geography, which can be appreciated thanks to an awareness of the actual physical geography, so the question “To map or not to map?” must, with appropriate caution, be answered affirmatively (p. 571).
Should students of the Hebrew Bible obtain a copy of this collection? Should Professors assign this as a textbook to their introductory courses on the Hebrew Bible? Should persons simply interested in learning about the Hebrew Bible read this book?
Those questions must, without hesitation, be answered affirmatively.
Author of the influential book ‘Biblical Exegesis and the Formation of Christian Culture’ and numerous other monographs and papers, Professor Frances Young, emerita Edward Cadbury Professor of Theology at the University of Birmingham, will consider some of the ways in which the early Christians approached the Bible as the key text of their religion. The self-identity of the Christian community and the development of theology all hinge on this formative period in the life of the Church.
Please note that if you are already registered for the Monday of the British Patristics Conference you have been automatically registered for this event and do not need to reregister on this page.
- Monday, 5 September 2016 from 18:00 to 19:00 (BST)
- Gisbert Kapp Building, Lecture Theatre 1, Room 203 – University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom – View Map
Via Richard Goode on the FB.