As Chris Rollston notes in the preceding post-
This inscription does *not* constitute evidence for widespread literacy, neither at Qeiyafa, nor in the region generally. One inscription with a personal name and patronymic simply cannot carry that sort of freight. There has sometimes been a desire on the part of some to view an inscription, or a handful of inscriptions, as evidence for widespread literacy. This is a very romantic view of the evidence. In reality, however, the lion’s share of epigraphic evidence from the Iron Age is connected in some fashion with officials and officialdom (Rollston 2008b; Rollston 2015), just as it is in the rest of the ancient Near East at this time period.
I wish everyone who kept blathering on about how these Qeiyafa inscriptions proved widespread literacy (and thus some sort of Davidic Kingdom) would realize how truly absurd that claim is and how bizarre the leap from a pot scrawled with various words to a full blown kingdom is.