Twitter Theology That Makes Me Sigh


Really?  So, 1) how would one go about demonstrating that claim?  And 2) who says the churches Paul planted succeeded?  3)  Do you consider the mess of the Corinthian church a ‘success’?  4) Why?  What on earth is good about that congregation and how could it possibly be a model for any church?   5) How do you know the churches Paul planted wouldn’t have been MORE successful if he had been able to be with them longer?  6) Paul’s work at Ephesus (!) certainly didn’t last and wasn’t successful even for 40 or 50 years (since it is the Church excoriated in Revelation for having lost its first love).  7) So what is success anyway?

It’s just more of the short sighted pseudo-scholarship twitter seems to accommodate most ‘successfully’.  If your ‘theology’ can be expressed in 140 characters, it isn’t a theology worth holding.

[No offense to the good people at IVP].

About Jim

I am a Pastor, and Lecturer in Church History and Biblical Studies at Ming Hua Theological College.
This entry was posted in pseudo-scholarship, pseudo-theology. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Twitter Theology That Makes Me Sigh

  1. Wow! Excellent answer Doctor!
    I don’t know the person who twitted but there is a movement out here that is opposed to the idea of leadership in what they call “church” and they will disseminate absurdities just like that one over the social networks to deceive their incipient followers.


Comments are closed.