Zwinglius Redivivus

ἐμοὶ δὲ εἰς ἐλάχιστόν ἐστιν, ἵνα ὑφ᾽ ὑμῶν ἀνακριθῶ

Just In Case You’re Fairly Blind and Can’t Look at the ‘Jesus Wife’ Fragment and Know it Isn’t Ancient…

There’s more evidence that the thing is a piece of bogus rubbish- kindly provided by the scholar who lives up to the first syllable of his surname, Mark Goodacre

Line 1 of the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife fragment copies a typo from a website interlinear of Coptic Thomas

And now a little more detail.  One of the difficulties with the Gospel of Jesus’ Wife fragment is that it appears to be dependent, on every line, on words and phrases from our one extant Coptic text of the Gospel of Thomas (See Francis Watson’s articles; see too Leo Depuydt’s forthcoming report; see also Andrew Bernhard).  The difficulties that this poses for the authenticity of the fragment are serious (see my reflections).

Serious indeed.  I sure hope that any of the folk still holding out false hope that the fragment is authentic (or meaningful) will read Mark’s entire post as well as Stevie Carlson’s remarks (always cogent, that Stevie C.)

Written by Jim

11 Oct 2012 at 8:44 am

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] of the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” in which he detects evidence that the modern forger used Mike Grondin’s online interlinear – namely the reproduction of a typo from that […]


Comments are closed.