Is Joe Pitts the Dumbest Man In Congress?

I realize Congress is loaded with the inept, but is it really, really possible, or plausible, that a United States Congressman is as ignorant as Joe Pitts?

Apparently, my congressman believes that the solution for peace in the Middle East will be reached by encouraging negotiations between a vegetable and a dead man.  My father recently received a form letter response from Joe Pitts (Pennsylvania’s 16th district). A year ago, after visiting me in Ramallah, my father contacted Pitts’ office, expressing his opposition to House Resolution 268, a one-sided resolution that condemned Palestinians and reaffirmed the US “commitment to a negotiated settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict”. The incredibly baffling, much-delayed response from Pitts included this gem:

With the global war against terrorism, it is now incumbent on Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Yasir Arafat to clamp down on Palestinian extremists that have perpetuated violence and to restart a peace process that has collapsed.

How stupid is this man?

This response was dated April 20, 2012. I realize that members of Congress use form letters to communicate quickly with their constituents, but when they are as outdated as this on an issue that is so central to US foreign policy, one might question the intelligence or efficacy of such a politician. I wonder to whom Pitts thought he was giving those standing ovations when Netanyahu spoke to Congress?

Ineptitude.  Shame on the people of Pennsylvania for electing such a dullard.  And small wonder the country is in the miserable shape it is.  We don’t elect the best and brightest, we elect the dumbest and most incompetent.  With thanks to Irene Hahn on FB for pointing out the misery.

Tagged: , ,

2 thoughts on “Is Joe Pitts the Dumbest Man In Congress?

  1. Doug 15 May 2012 at 9:51 pm

    i have to think he is average. There really are worse elected officials.


  2. Mickey Haist Jr 16 May 2012 at 2:04 pm

    Pitts has begun an ineffectual damage control campaign, as indicated by this typo-ridden report.


Comments are closed.