Here’s an intriguing piece in Al-Jazeera

Even Jews can be barred by Israel from travelling to Bethlehem – for the thought crime of supporting Palestinian rights.

Thought Crime… how ‘1984’.

What difference will it make to the lives of Palestinians in the West Bank when the world meets their demands for freedom and self-determination?  One difference it will make: like other peoples of the world, the Palestinians will get to decide who they can invite to visit them.  Right now, if you, as a citizen of the United States, Canada, or Europe, decide that you want to visit Bethlehem, a Palestinian city in the West Bank – the same Bethlehem that Christians believe to be the birthplace of Jesus – you have two ways to begin your journey. You can fly to Israel, and cross the 1967 border to the West Bank. Or you can fly to Jordan, and cross to the West Bank over one of the bridges. But whichever way you go, you cannot pass to Bethlehem without the permission of the Netanyahu government, which controls all paths you can take to Bethlehem.

If you are a Likud supporter, flying into the Israeli airport should present no problem. But if you are a supporter of Palestinian rights, the Netanyahu government could stop you from going to Bethlehem on purely political grounds – even if you have never committed any crime and have no intention of ever committing one, even if you have never attended a Palestinian protest in the West Bank and have no intention of attending one. You could be barred by the Netanyahu government from going to Bethlehem simply for the thought crime of supporting Palestinian human rights.  Indeed, even Jews from the US can be barred by the Netanyahu government from travelling to Bethlehem for the thought crime of supporting Palestinian rights.

Amazing. Just simply indefensibly amazing.

The Netanyahu government says that it will “round up activists who land in the country and deport them”, which is again a spectacular fact. Apparently, you can be deported by the Netanyahu government not because of what you do, but because of who you are. If you are an “activist”, then Palestinians welcome you to Bethlehem, but you may not be able to get there, because the Netanyahu government may deport you for being such an “activist”.

Good grief. Seriously.

So far, there has been scant press coverage in the US of “Welcome to Palestine”, and this again is a spectacular fact. But the good news is that, thanks to the wonders of the internet, we don’t need to wait on the New York Times and the Washington Post. We can follow and spread the news on Welcome to Palestine on Twitter using the hashtag #fly2palestine.

And I’m going to. Some of us still believe in freedom.

And perhaps even more amazingly, a Swedish tourist was made to sign a ‘political contract’ upon entering Israel:

Check this out. This is a “contract” that a Swedish citizen was required to sign upon entering Israel via the Eilat land crossing:

click to enlarge

The government of Israel wants nothing more than to muzzle all dissent.


4 thoughts on “‘Thought-Crime’

  1. gunneweg 15 Apr 2012 at 5:51 am

    Has the Al-Jazeera- writer –his name was not mentioned by Jim–even thought of visiting Syria lately and mention that she/he supports tyranny, or joining the Egyptians on the famous Cairo square; and that is enough because I can go on, as the Al-Jazeera-writer knows well.
    Proportions, good people, keep proportions and give the good message to Asad and so called “brothers” in Egypt.


    • Jim 15 Apr 2012 at 7:22 am

      I agree- proportions are completely necessary. Hence, if Iran or Syria can be criticized, and should be, and have been, Israeli policy too is open to criticism.


  2. gunneweg 15 Apr 2012 at 11:17 am

    Dear Jim,
    criticism, yes, but does one want to “visit” Syria and Egypt nowadays to tell them with a plane-load of “visitors” while touring Syria or Egypt? I don’t think so. Criticism? Write it in your daily and weekly magazines.


    • Jim 15 Apr 2012 at 12:16 pm

      i wish our magazines would write about it. alas, there’s too much brad and angelina in the news for them to bother with such matters…

      i do have a problem, though, with the notion that ‘others are doing worse so what we’re doing isn’t so bad after all’ approach. wrong is wrong. it isn’t really a matter of degrees.


Comments are closed.