Zwinglius Redivivus

April 3, 2012

Cargill Points Out Another Problem with the “Jesus Discovery” Claim

Filed under: Archaeology — Jim @ 10:41

Robert writes

The video points out 2 basic points:

Digitally inked images were released to the public without acknowledging that the videos had, in fact, been inked (with ink colored to look like a naturally engraved area). (After I wrote my blog post (http://robertcargill.com/2012/03/13/sins-of-commission-and-omission/), they later designated the image as “marked” and uploaded the “uninked” image for comparison). The digital ink does not correspond to the engraved areas, giving the illusion of a fish where none is present. http://robertcargill.com/2012/04/02/youtube-video-digitally-manipulated-fish-in-the-margins-imagery-on-the-so-called-jonah-ossuary/.

If you plan on watching the April 12 (it should have aired April 1, let’s just be honest) ‘Jesus Discovery’ special on the ‘Discovery Channel’ you need to watch the video above first and check out the other links on the subject (which are now voluminous).

1 Comment

  1. […] Mythicism, and Related Round-UpApr 4th, 2012 by James F. McGrath TweetMark Goodacre had a busier blogging day than we’ve seen from him in a long time, discussing both the evidence that ossuaries in […]

    Like

    Pingback by Talpiot Tomb, Jesus Mythicism, and Related Round-Up « Exploring Our Matrix — April 5, 2012 @ 12:55


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

The WordPress Classic Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 573 other followers