Paul Flesher: The Ossuary

Paul’s got a fine essay in Bible and Interpretation today- on the trial of the century’s ossuary.

The supposedly ancient inscription on the Jewish ossuary (an ancient burial box for bones) was only five Aramaic words long, “James son of Joseph brother of Jesus,” and even Bob Simon on Sixty Minutes could see the that last two words, “brother of Jesus,” had been added by a different hand. How hard could it be to prove in court of law that those two words were a modern fake?

So true.  Except the Judge in the case couldn’t.  Flesher continues-

Too hard. That was the view of an Israeli judge when he released his 475-page verdict last week after a seven-year long trial. Judge Aharon Farkash concluded “the prosecution failed to prove beyond all reasonable doubt…that the ossuary is a forgery.”

Enjoy the rest as I did- especially these paragraphs-

Let me make one last observation. The James Ossuary is a supposed antique object without provenience. Because the state of Israel allows the sale of some ancient objects according to a tight set of regulations (usually impossible to enforce), there is a widespread trade in looted and forged antiquities. The buyers of these items range from tourists seeking a souvenir to take home to wealthy, dedicated collectors willing to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for an object.

Looting robs true ancient items of all information concerning their historical context and prevents all humanity from using them to learn about our shared past. Forged objects and inscriptions mix with authentic looted items in this shadowy trade and can fool even the most dedicated and learned of experts.

Many of the scholars who have promoted the James Ossuary inscription as authentic, such as Andre Lemaire and Robert Deutsch, have published unprovenienced inscriptions. Non-scholars such as Hershel Shanks, repeatedly argue for the publication of unprovenienced objects and inscriptions. They say, how can we let all of this material be ignored? The James Ossuary makes clear why it should be ignored, because you never know when it is forged or authentic. Even if you are fairly certain of authenticity of an unprovenienced item, its date and geographic location remain unknown. If the item is published and then used in scholarship, it can distort the historical record.

Amen and amen.  It’s a shame many of our colleagues ignore such sage advice.


2 thoughts on “Paul Flesher: The Ossuary

  1. deutschr 22 Mar 2012 at 6:47 am

    I am amazed time and again of the untruth stories which appear in the news paper and on the net conecting my name with forgeries following the false and malicious accusations fabricated and promoted by the IAA.

    The fact that I have no connection with the manufactures of fakes has been prooven many years ago in the court and repeated attempts made by Judge to convince the prosecusion to drop the case against me were in vain despite the fact that the prosecutor admitted orally in the court that he made a mistake attributing me such accusations ! But they wanted to prevent to weaken the case against Golan.

    After 7.5 years and 74 prosecution witnesses I was found not guilty on all charges by the district court judge Aharon Farkash which has a record of finding guilty 99% of the accused before him !!

    But now there is a new hallucination by the distinguish director Flesher:
    that “I have promoted the James Ossuary inscription as authentic” !

    From where he took this new scientific data ?

    I never expressed my opinion on the subject because one can not do so based on the photo alone.

    I need exactly 5 minutes to inspect it in order to find out if it is genuine or not, but I was not allowed to see it by the IAA.

    In any event, do not make mistakes, I am going to sue the IAA for their criminal act against me, as I promised over 7 years ago !!

    Robert Deutsch


  2. […] a Video that may Change your PerspectiveMar 25th, 2012 by James F. McGrath TweetA round up of the latest blogging on the Talpiot tombs and James ossuary.James Tabor has provided more photos of the most discussed […]


Comments are closed.