3 comments on “Dan Wallace Has More to Say About the ‘Earliest Fragment of Mark’, But Adds Nothing New

  1. Question for you:

    In the history of archaeology, are veritable finds often preceded by surreptitious behavior and lack of photographs? In other words, is this “keeping things under wraps” actually pretty commonplace from a historical point of view?

  2. Pingback: The Oldest Manuscript of Mark? Round Two « Euangelion Kata Markon

Comments are closed.