What is meant by laws of nature other than some rule or order established by some legitimate authority? That implies a combination of intelligence and power or a designing, governing mind, which is what [the doctrine of] providence essentially asserts. — Thomas Oden
This suggests that when science speaks of the ‘laws of nature’ it implies a lawgiver. Whether it wants to admit it or not.
This is to completely misunderstand what we mean when we speak of a “law of science”. Scientific laws are descriptions of the behaviour of the universe. There is no need for a “lawgiver” any more than there is a need for a lawgiver to make the circumference of a circle equal to Pi times the diameter.
LikeLike
what made the circle
LikeLike