Zwinglius Redivivus

They’re ‘Excavating’ [Sic!] in Kentucky for the Ark…

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on August 15, 2014

A bit of fun poking double entendre in the title of the post concerning the story here…

Workers are clearing land in northern Kentucky to build a long-stalled tourist attraction featuring Noah’s Ark.

Ken Ham, head of the Christian ministry Answers in Genesis, posted video of the excavation work on his Facebook page this week.

It is the first sign of large-scale construction activity at the site in Grant County since plans for the 510-foot long biblical ark were announced by Answers in Genesis in 2010. The project had been delayed when private donations did not keep pace with the construction timeline.

“They’re doing all the site work now to get the spot ready,” Michael Zovath, the project’s coordinator, said Thursday. Zovath said heavy machinery will eventually push away about a million cubic feet of earth and rock to make way for the 200-acre ark site and parking lot.

Oh.  Boy.  Just think how many out of work academics can serve as tour guides!!!!!!  Take heart recent grads, you can work for Ham!

Comments Off

Maybe in 50 Years the Person who Inscribed the ‘James’ Ossuary Will Come Forward as Well…

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on August 3, 2014

The mysterious rune stone that disappeared from the shores of Pojac Point, strangely resurfaced and has been concealed under lock and key, now adds another chapter to its odd tale.  Plans to put it on public display in Updike Park were suspended after a Providence man said he carved the runic letters in 1964.  Adding to the whodunit is the fact that people who lived near the stone in the 1950s say they remember seeing the carvings before 1964.

The enigmatic stone, sometimes called the Narragansett Rune Stone or Quidnessett Rock, is a 6-ton, 7-foot-long boulder that came to public attention in 1984, when a quahogger noticed its carved symbols, visible only at low tide. Archaeologists, geologists and historians have debated whether it is evidence of Viking exploration. Disappearing from Pojac Point in June 2012, causing a dispute among neighbors, it was recovered by the attorney general’s office in April 2013, and kept under wraps at the University of Rhode Island. Experts, one from as far away as Sweden, have studied it, and the state Department of Environmental Management was planning to display it in the park.

Everett Brown, 63, of Providence, has added another layer to the story, coming forward to say that he carved the Norse-like letters 50 years ago.

Fraud.  Ain’t it glorious…  Maybe the guy who inscribed the ‘James Ossuary will come forward one day too.

I Guess That Shows You, Minimalists… (Or, More Misrepresentation of Archaeology)

Posted in pseudo-archaeology by Jim on June 25, 2014

Comments Off

The Ignorant Cohort of Elkingtons Are Still Trying to Convince the World that The ‘Lead Codices’ Are Important

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on May 22, 2014


They’ve gone full bore PR campaign to do it in an ignorance laced ‘interview’ which is nothing more than a poorly framed parade example of pseudo-scholarship.

The ‘International Times’ must have been paid a lot of money for the ‘privilege’ of publishing this rapaciously senseless ‘interview’.  You’ll enjoy it.  Especially if you are a biblioblogger.  The Elkington’s don’t like you at all.  But probably only because you’re putting a dent in their chances of selling their ‘product’.

If you want one of these little trinkets, next time you’re in Jordan, you can pick up a dozen.  Easily.  And then you can try to pimp them too.  But be sure to be mad at anyone who questions your ‘scholarship’.

With thanks to Jim Aitken for telling me about the farcical nonsense.

Yay! More Archaeological Use of Jesus Without any Evidence!

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on May 21, 2014

For the Rev. Juan M. Solana, it was the spiritual equivalent of striking oil.  When he set out to develop a resort for Christian pilgrims in Galilee, he unearthed a holy site: the presumed hometown of Mary Magdalene and an ancient synagogue where experts say Jesus may well have taught. The project, which Father Solana, a Roman Catholic priest, describes as “providential,” will be blessed by Pope Francis during his visit to the Holy Land this month.

Yay!  Now if only they could also connect the site to Abraham and Jacob and Joshua and Moses they’d have it made.  They could erect all sorts of ‘Jesus slept here’ signs and tell tourists anything they liked because without contradictory evidence they will be believed.  Even with contradictory evidence, or as the case is presently, no evidence at ALL, they’ll still be believed.

Poor Jesus.  He’s used to sell more stuff than anyone else.

Comments Off

Oded Gets His Fake Back

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on May 21, 2014

jehoashAn inscribed stone that may be the only remnant of Solomon’s Temple has been returned to its owner after an 11-year legal battle waged by the Israeli government.

So Matthew Kalman, referring to the return to Oded Golan of his fake, patently fake, obviously fake, tremendously fake fraudulent ‘Jehoash Tablet’.

I hope he sells it to a gullible collector for 80 bazillion dollars and the collector travels the world showing it off at shows where films by Simcha Jacobovici play on monitors in loud surround sound and visitors are separated from their hard earned money to the tune of $100 a pop.  That would be a fitting fate for the fake.  And for all those people ignorant enough to bow at the altar of fraud.

Maybe Harvard Theological Review will publish an essay on it too, in which the author of the piece defends the authenticity of the holy relic in spite of the fact that there’s not one scintilla of evidence anywhere at all that the thing is authentic and anything other than a forgery.  That would be the icing on the cake.

A Guest Post – By Joe Zias: “A Dummies Guide to Koshering Forged Antiquities”

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on May 6, 2014

A Dummies Guide to Koshering Forged Antiquities

This whole sad “Jesus wife ” papyrus affair reminds me of an incident in Ein Gedi a few years back. A high ranking official from the IAA where I had been employed, visited the on-going excavations there and the archaeologist, excitedly showed him an amulet with Jewish symbols found in-situ, earlier that day. The experienced excavator was thinking of calling a press conference to announce the find. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed and the official from the IAA showed him, despite the fact that it was found in-situ, it had been planted and was a modern day forgery. The question now becomes why? Well as I’ve said time and time again, ‘we’ve seen this movie before’ in that the forger will wait until after the forged artifact is shown in a press conference, with the archaeologist believing that as it was found in-situ, it was authentic, thus giving it his seal of approval. Sooner or later, identical amulets will appear on the dealers shelves or as with what happens with high end items, there are always buyers waiting in line to purchase these finds, bypassing the market. I, in fact, was once approached by an individual who asked me to ‘plant’/salt an ostraca in an excavation in which Yadin had excavated. That ‘2,000 year old’ zinc coffin lid found in Qumran, coated with modern day paint to prevent corrosion, is but another example in which items are salted into a dig.

I have this uneasy feeling that Professor King, may have been unwittingly duped into such a transaction and it would just be a matter of time before a few more similar fragments would turn up on the market, as we have seen with those Jordanian lead codices. We’re dealing with highly sophisticated forgers, which it would appear have assistance from academically trained scholars.

Perhaps no field is immune to forgery as when it comes to amber studies, in which amber is melted down and modern day insects are embedded in the new amber which is difficult to tell, unless one takes the item to an entomologist who can readily discern a modern fly from one in antiquity. One of the EU labs producing these fakes eventually hired a university trained entomologist whose task was to change or remove those morphological features in which one could easily determine if the insect was recently embedded or ancient, thus removing tell tale signs of forgery. It eventually ended up in the courts when a US university challenged their right to do such, and the lab producing these forged items replied, ‘it’s no ones business what we do’.

Anything, you see, can be made kosher if the right ‘expert’ is at work.

It’s Just Another Reason To Disdain the So Called ‘Apologetic Enterprise’

Say what you want about Karl Barth, he was, admittedly, wrong about a number of things; but he was 1000% correct to despise the ‘apologetic’ enterprise.  Read his Church Dogmatics for the full fury of his rage against the ignorant and ungodly attempt at the rationalization and bastardization of the Christian faith.

In the meanwhile, yet another reason to despise apologetics has reared its ugly head- once more in the person of one Josh McDowell.

All I wish to say in response is-  ugh.  Stop it.

Comments Off

It Takes a Village (Of Crooks to Foist Fraud on the Public)

Posted in Modern Culture, pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on May 4, 2014

A very interesting essay in the NYT about fake paintings which, mutatis mutandis, is also true of ‘biblical antiquities’.  It really does take a whole team of fraudsters to convince the public of the historical value of a trinket.  From dealers to sellers to collectors to ‘scholars’ whose interest lies less in scholarship and more in fame or renown.

The recent arrest in Spain of two brothers accused of passing off forged paintings as the work of America’s greatest Modernist masters has refocused attention on the people behind an art fraud that has lasted 15 years, garnered $80 million and helped bring down New York’s oldest gallery, Knoedler & Company. But court documents filed in connection with the case reveal that ambitious art swindles like this one depend on far more than an ingenious con operation or a gifted imitator. Rather, a network of people, sometimes unwittingly, repeatedly helped lend these fake paintings a veneer of credibility. When it comes to the sale of bogus art, it takes a village.

Yes- and in the world of papyrus fragments and other frauds it takes a village and a lot of gullibility.  Just see what’s been made of the fraudulent ‘Jesus Wife’ fragment, the ‘James Ossuary inscription’, the ‘Jehoash Tablet’, the ‘Jordan Lead Codices’, and all the other absurd nonsense spewing from the workshops of the East.

Yet Another ‘Image Of Jesus’ – And This one is ‘The Earliest’! (Aren’t They All)

Posted in pseudo-archaeology, pseudo-scholarship by Jim on April 27, 2014

Egypt dig may have unearthed earliest image of Jesus

Says Ha’aretz.

Curly-haired young man on wall of 6th-century early Christian tomb could have been Christ, postulate Spanish Egyptologists.

Um hm

A team of Spanish Egyptologists may have found one of the earliest-known pictures of Jesus Christ, in a 6th-century tomb unearthed in Upper Egypt. That and other images are painted onto the walls of a crypt inside an underground structure, whose use has otherwise baffled the finders.

The main attraction at Al Bahnasa is Oxyrhynchus, which was a regional capital in ancient Upper Egypt some 160km south of Cairo, where interestingly the locals apparently worshipped a sacred Nile fish that, according to legend, swallowed Osiris’ penis when he was dismembered by his brother Seth. The ancient city also boasts a number of temples to Osiris. But the “exceptional” discovery the archaeological team made in the tomb dates from a much later era, the 6th century C.E., says the team headed by Spanish archaeologist Josep Padro.

The tomb is believed to have been the interment site for a writer and a priestly family, though the archaeologists do not understand the function of the underground stone structure, they admit. But inside the crypt, they found an image from the first Coptic Christian period showing a young man with curly hair and a short tunic, with a hand raised in blessing.

Well, I guess we know what Jesus must have looked like- because 6th century art is photographically accurate….

How long will it be before some archaeologist finds a pile of poo in a dig and declares it the very poo of Jesus because it was located near a wall painting of Jesus on a Roman toilet?

Oh for the days when supposition and guesswork weren’t the main tools used by scholars.  These days, just find something, attach ‘Jesus’ or ‘Iron Age Israel’ to it and people without sense will be wetting themselves like an excited puppy about it.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,133 other followers