Zwinglius Redivivus

Archive for the ‘Dilettante’ Category

I Wonder if there Will be a Ham v. Gungor Like the Earlier Ham on Nye

with one comment

Some Christian singer named Gungor (I’ve never heard of him – probably because contemporary Christian music is as un-interesting to me as the never ending debates about theories of origins) is having disagreements with the Creation Museum / Noah’s Ark literal defender of a literal Genesis Ken Ham.

All of which provokes, in me, a big fat ‘who cares and why is this in the news anyway?’  When a singer and a non-theologian debate the Bible I shrug my shoulders and leave the blind to fight the blind.  It’s like watching two 4 year olds fight.  You know there will be lots of rolling around but very little substantive action and certainly nothing life altering.

Still, both deserve an award for their willingness to debate (things beyond their training and skill) – so here it is:

dilly-the-dilettante

Written by Jim

September 5, 2014 at 14:11

Richard Dawkins is the UK’s Ann Coulter

Like Coulter, he is a publicity whore.  Like Coulter, he seldom knows what he’s talking about.  Like Coulter, he loves the spotlight.  Like Coulter, he befouls himself with more ignorance about theology and religion than a herd of swine wallowing in their own excrement.  Like Coulter, he is either a moron, a liar, or a complete imbecile.  Perhaps it’s all three.

In any event, Richard Dawkins is the UK’s Ann Coulter.  And he should be understood as such.  Nothing more.

imbecile

The Most Ignorant Paper I’ve Ever Read

Is this one, which I only made it 1/3 through before my head exploded from the blatant and unrepentant stupidity.

lunatic

Written by Jim

July 26, 2014 at 08:22

Look, People, The Bible isn’t A Science Text and Science Can’t Address Ultimate Reality

As long as people forget that, or never learn it in the first place, these idiotic and pointless arguments will continue.  Scripture doesn’t care about your theory of the ‘how’-ness of it all.  It’s concern is the ‘why’-ness.

Grow up, all of you.

Are People Really Asking Such Silly Questions?

Did Adam and Eve speak Dutch? A theory dating back to the Renaissance places the Garden of Eden in what is today the Netherlands and Belgium.

Uggghhhhhhh……

Israelis and Jews have it all wrong, apparently. The Promised Land is not where they think. It’s actually a few thousand kilometers to the northwest in the Netherlands and Belgium.

In fact, the Low Countries have the dual honor of being both paradise on Earth and the place where many of the Bible’s most prominent celebrities did their thing, at least according to Johannes Goropius Becanus (1519-1572).

This Renaissance polymath was not only a physician to the royals, he was also an amateur linguist. According to his bizarre theories, the Garden of Eden was actually located in Antwerp, and Adam and Eve spoke the Antwerp dialect of Dutch.

And therein lies the problem. Amateur linguists are just the worst of the Dilettante’s tribe.

His proof? The etymology of their names. According to Becanus, Adam apparently derived from the Dutch compound Haat-Dam (Dam-Against-Hate) and Eve is Eeuw-Vat (The-Eternal-Barrel). He similarly “discovered” origins for Cane, Abel, Noah and other biblical figures. Becanus believed that these etymologies were self-evident; after all, he was convinced that Dutch was the oldest language in the world (Duits, i.e. De Oudst, or The Oldest).

He also theorized that Antwerp was founded by the descendants of Noah, though how they located this low-lying town – only 7.5 meters above sea level – after the reported deluge is unclear.

Though he did have admirers, Becanus and his theories were ridiculed even during his lifetime. His contemporary, Dutch religious leader and historian Joseph Scaliger (1540-1609) scoffed: “I have never read such nonsense.” He derided Becanus as the man who “was not ashamed to criticize Moses for drawing etymologies from Hebrew rather than Dutch.”

Dilettantes always have some weird admirers. There are always people who revel in ignorance. Read the rest of the Ha’aretz essay, it’s quite fun.

Written by Jim

June 23, 2014 at 20:28

I Knew They Despised Me In Essex- But This is News!

Yes, it’s more fan mail.  And I wonder where the petition is- I’d love to sign it…

psycho

But the real question is, why in the world is T. Michael Law (or Mikey Holcomb- could be either, might be both) using ‘Jim Sarco’ as a screen name?

An Entire Project That Deserves a Dilly

Is this monstrosity, as described by Bryan Bibb (and just to be clear, Bryan isn’t the monstrosity).  So, to the Chronicle Project I say, here’s your Dilly!  Seldom is it more well deserved.

dilly-the-dilettante

Written by Jim

May 1, 2014 at 10:32

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,128 other followers