From Now On You Can Call Me The Anti-ultracrepidarian

Posted on

ul·tra·crep·i·dar·i·an [uhl-truh-krep-i-dair-ee-uhn]
adjective 1. noting or pertaining to a person who criticizes, judges, or gives advice outside the area of his or her expertise: The play provides a classic, simplistic portrayal of an ultracrepidarian mother-in-law.

Origin:
1800–20; ultra- + Latin crepidam ‘sole of a shoe, sandal’ (< Greek krepis ‘shoe’); in allusion to the words of Pliny the Elder ne supra crepidam sutor judicare ‘let the cobbler not judge above the sandal’; cf. the English proverb “let the cobbler stick to his last”.

With thanks to Alastair Roberts for telling me about this delightful word which perfectly summarizes the concept of dilettantism.

About these ads

7 thoughts on “From Now On You Can Call Me The Anti-ultracrepidarian

    [...] Deliberatefraudists: Smackdown in the BlogosphereApril 29, 2012 By James F. McGrath Leave a CommentJim West posted the following definition in a post in which he defined himself as an anti-ultracrepi…:ul·tra·crep·i·dar·i·an [uhl-truh-krep-i-dair-ee-uhn] adjective 1. noting or pertaining to a [...]

    James F. McGrath said:
    April 29, 2012 at 23:46

    I’m so relieved to hear that you won’t be commenting on matters of modern biology and related scientific fields any longer! ;-)

      Jim responded:
      April 30, 2012 at 04:19

      i’ve never commented on them specifically nor have i blathered on about the ‘who gives a rip’ evolution stuff. my comments about such insignificant matters is always either mocking or derisive, certainly not debate.

        James F. McGrath said:
        April 30, 2012 at 07:25

        What makes your comments not specific? At any rate, I fail to see the distinction you are trying to make, or how your mockery as a dilettante in the domain of science fails to make you a hypocrite when you criticize those who do the very same thing in Biblical studies.

        Mockery and sarcasm are not superior to debate, as though by not engaging in the latter you are doing better than those you criticize. I really don’t understand how you can think this is OK.

        Jim responded:
        April 30, 2012 at 07:27

        it’s ok if you don’t like my mockery or can’t understand the distinction between mockery and debate.

        James F. McGrath said:
        April 30, 2012 at 07:46

        I understand the distinction between mockery and debate. What I do not understand is how engaging in one in relation to a field not your own and which you poorly comprehend makes you a dilettante while engaging in the other does not.

        Jim responded:
        April 30, 2012 at 08:09

        a dilettante is a person who believes themselves qualified to offer an opinion on a subject when they aren’t adequately qualified. i hold no such opinion of myself concerning sciency stuff. to put it plainly, i never pretend to be a scientist in the way simcha pretends to be a scholar/archaeologist. etc.

Comments are closed.