Zwinglius Redivivus

Quote of the Year: On The Scoundrelism of Anonymity

Schopenhauer portrait1

“Anonymity, that shield for every kind of literary scoundrelism, must disappear. The pretext for its introduction into literary periodicals was that it protected honest critics from the wrath of authors and their patrons. But for every case of this kind there are a hundred cases where it serves merely to allow complete irresponsibility to reviewers who would be unable to defend what they write, or even to conceal the shame of those so venal and abject as to recommend books to the public in exchange for a tip from their publisher. It often merely serves to cloak the obscurity, incompetence and insignificance of the reviewer. It is unbelievable what impudence these fellows are capable of, and from what degree of literary knavery they will not shrink, once they know themselves secure in the shadow of anonymity.”  –  Schopenhauer

Well said, S., well said indeed! With thanks to Mark R. for sending it to me.  By the way, that’s the same expression that’s always on my face too.

About these ads

Written by Jim

September 2, 2010 at 15:14

Posted in Modern Culture

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. You just WISH you had his hair! :)

    Scott F

    September 2, 2010 at 15:29

    • dude didn’t own a comb! but that is some crazy hair.

      Jim

      September 2, 2010 at 15:31

  2. [...] "Anonymity, that shield for every kind of literary scoundrelism, must disappear. The pretext for its introduction into literary periodicals was that it protected honest critics from the wrath of authors and their patrons. But for every case of this kind there are a hundred cases where it serves merely to allow complete irresponsibility to reviewers who would be unable to defend what they write, or even to conceal the shame of those so venal and a … Read More [...]

  3. Doc, that is you in 15 years. Except for the hair, which will be falling out. But, your weight will be down due to your late night gym workouts and your lawn mowing. And you will be wearing overalls.

    Doug

    September 2, 2010 at 18:04

    • (you know that’s not really me, right?)

      Jim

      September 2, 2010 at 18:10

  4. Of course I know. You don’t look anything like that, usually.

    Doug

    September 2, 2010 at 19:10

  5. Of course Jim looks EXACTLY like that every time he blogs. I’ve seen that expression every time I read this blog, reflected in the computer screen…

    (except when he morphes into Zwingli)

    steph

    September 2, 2010 at 21:16

  6. I agree. It’s disgraceful.

    NT Wrong

    September 3, 2010 at 00:19

  7. I love philosophers. Half the fun is in looking at their photos! I think it was either Leibniz or Lessing that looks absolutely rad. We’re talking the most absurd baby-face of all time.

    Emerson Fast

    September 3, 2010 at 00:30

  8. yes – and even you aren’t anonymous, Wrong, not that you’re really Wrong anyway.

    steph

    September 3, 2010 at 09:06


Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,164 other followers